I read an interesting essay in the NY TIMES yesterday about UK Prime Minister David Cameron's decision to measure how happy his constituents feel.
Not surprisingly, Cameron's program has been met with a share of skepticism, even ridicule. However, the author of the piece, Roger Cohen, observes that it's no secret that money alone does not buy happiness.
Cohen writes: "... the case for trying to measure the happiness of a society, rather than its growth and productivity alone, has become compelling. When Western industrialized societies started measuring gross domestic product, the issue for many was survival. Now most people have enough — or far more than enough by the standards of human history — but the question remains: “What’s going on inside their heads?"
"Starting next month, the government will pose the following questions and ask people to respond on a scale of zero to 10: How happy did you feel yesterday? How anxious did you feel yesterday? How satisfied are you with your life nowadays? To what extent do you feel the things you do in your life are worthwhile?"
"... Andrew Oswald, a happiness economics expert at the University of Warwick, suggested the questions were a good start... The important thing, he argues, it to shift “from the concept of financial prosperity to the idea of emotional prosperity.” Perhaps that’s the 21st-century indicator we need: gross emotional prosperity, or G.E.P."
The Brits mention intangibles like "nature" "birdsong" "the environment" "open spaces" and "clear air" as having a significant impact on their happiness. Cohen concludes that "...These moments were linked to nature, to finding time, to feeling the transcendent power of the human spirit."
It seems the challenge in this day and age is finding time....